Analysis of the Level of Understanding of the Concept of the Isoline Method of Linear Program Material Based on APOS Theory in terms of Learning Interest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v7i2.5250Keywords:
isolin method, linear programming, APOS theory, interest in learningAbstract
One of the methods that can be used to find solutions to linear programming models is the Graphical Method. Graphical methods are divided into the isoline method and the extreme point method. Based on initial observations and interviews, it was found that around 54% of students still needed help understanding the isoline method material in solving linear programs, especially when given real problems related to everyday life. In addition, students' learning interest in linear programming courses also varies. So the purpose of research in this article is to describe the level of understanding of students who have high, medium, and low learning interest in linear programming material, precisely the isoline method material, in determining the optimum solution. The method in this study is a qualitative method with a sampling technique using purposive sampling. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire method for data on student learning interests and semi-structured test and interview methods to describe the level of student understanding based on APOS theory. The instruments in this study were questionnaires, written tests, and interview guidelines. Checking the validity of the data in this study used time triangulation. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the research show that: (1) subjects with high learning interest are at the level of schematic understanding; (2) subjects with interest in learning are at the level of understanding objects; and (3) subjects with low interest in learning are at the level of understanding of Action.
Downloads
References
Amelia, S. R., Syamsuri, & Santosa, C. A. H. F. (2021). Konstruksi konsep sistem persamaan linier tiga variabel bagi siswa sma berdasarkan teori apos. Jurnal Inovasi dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 44-58.
Anwar, Y. S., Mandailina, V., & Pramita, D. (2013). Efektifitas penerapan teori apos (action, process, object, schema) terhadap hasil belajar persamaan diferensial pada mahasiswa program studi pendidikan matematika tahun akademik 2012/2013. Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 51-54.
Arnawa, M., Sumarno, U., Kartasasmita, B., & Baskoro, E. (2007). Applying the apos theory to improve student's ability to prove in elementary abstract algebra. Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society. 13. 10.22342/jims.13.1.80.133-148.
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS Theory : A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Mathematics Education. In American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. Springer. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199771338
Cristian, S. (2013). Penerapan Linear Programming Untuk Mengoptimalkan Jumlah Produksi Dalam Memperoleh Keuntungan Maksimal Pada Cv Cipta Unggul Pratama. The Winners, 55-60.
Daud, A. S., Adnan, N. S. M., Aziz, M. K. N. A., & Embong, Z. (2019). Students’ perception towards mathematics using apos theory: a case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-7.
Dubinsky, E. & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An international commission on mathematical instruction study. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: an apos analysis: Part 2. Springer, pp. 253–266.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: an apos-based analysis: part 1. Springer, pp. 335–359.
Dinullah, R. N. I, & Ernawati. (2021). Analisis pemahaman konsep berdasarkan tahapan apos peserta didik pada sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 282-295.
GarcÃÂa-MartÃÂnez, I., & Parraguez, M. (2017). The basic step in constructing the principle of mathematical induction is based on APOS theory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.04.001
Ginting, I. R. F. & Sutirna, S. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. MAJU:Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1). 16-29.
Gusmania, Y., & Agustyaningrum, N. (2020). Analisis pemahaman konsep matematis mahasiswa pada mata kuliah trigonometri. Jurnal Gantang, 5(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i2.2493
Handayani, K. I., Damris, M., & Kamid. (2021). Pemahaman siswa pada materi fungsi kuadrat dan fungsi rasional berdasarkan teori apos ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependence dan field independence. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1650-1660.
Herawaty, D., Widada, W., Handayani, S., Berindo, Febriaanti, R., & Anggoro, A. F. D. (2020). Students' obstacles in understanding the properties of the closed sets in terms of the APOS theory. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1470 , 1-6.
Ilyas, M., & Basir, F. (2016). Analysis of students' conceptual understanding of mathematics on set at class VII SMP Frater Palopo. In Proceedings of ICMSTEA 2016 : International Conference on Mathematics, Science, Technology, Education, and their Applications, Makassar, Indonesia, 3rd – 4th October 2016 (pp. 96–102). Makassar. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/icmstea/article/view/2631
Kadafuk, F. F., Djong, K. D., & Uskono, I. V. (2020). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel berdasarkan teori APOS bagi siswa SMP. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 127–135.
Khairani, N. (2012). Pembelajaran matematika menggunakan teori apos. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, 47-55.
Kuntarto, E. (2018). Analisis tingkat pemahaman guru terhadap konsep pembelajaran aritmatika-bahasa di sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v3i2.629
Komariyah, S., Afifah, D. S. N., & Resbiantoro, G. (2018). Analisis pemahaman konsep dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa. SOSIOHUMANIORA, 4(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/sosio/article/view/1477
Lestari, S. W. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran m-apos dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan motivasi belajar kalkulus II. Jurnal pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1 – 13
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama
Mulyono. (2012). Pemahaman mahasiswa field dependent dalam merekonstruksi. Kreano, 2086-2334.
Natalia, S.S., Sujatmiko, P., & Chrisnawati, H.E. (2017). Analisis tingkat pemahaman siswa berdasarkan teori apos pada materi persamaan kuadrat ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika (JPMM) Solusi Vol.I No.5 September 2017
Oktac, A., Trigueros, M., & Romo, A. (2019). Apos theory: connecting research and teaching. For the Learning of Mathematics 39, 1 (March, 2019) (pp. 33-37). Canada: FLM Publishing Association, New Westminster,.
Oktac, M. P. (2010). Construction of the vector space concept from the viewpoint of APOS theory. Linear Algebra and its Applications, pp. 2112–2124.
Piaget. (1965). The Origin of Intelligence in Children. Third Edition. (M. Cook, Trans.) New York: International Universities Press. Inc.
Rosida, N. & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis pemahaman konsep sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Jurnal Analisa, 6(2). 163-172.
Salgado, H., & Trigueros, M. (2015). Teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors using models and Apos Theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 100-120.
Sari, F. M., & Harini, E. (2015). Hubungan persepsi siswa terhadap mata pelajaran matematika minat belajar dan kemandirian belajar dengan hasil belajar matematika. UNION: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 61–68. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/union/article/view/280
Sefik, O., Uzun, O. E., & Dost, S. (2021). Content analysis of the apos theory studies on mathematics education conducted in turkey and internationally: a meta-synthesis study. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 404-428.
Silfia, I. & Pranyata, Y. I. P. (2021). Analisis pemahaman konsep pada materi sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel berdasarkan teori apos. SIGMA, 6(2). 141-147.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumliyah, & Rhosliana, R. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis melalui desain model pembelajaran jaring laba-laba berbasis discovery learning. Junal Hadharyah.
Sunandar. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran. Ristekdikti.
Susandi, K. U. (2022). Critical thinking skills: Error identifications on students’ with APOS theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), pp. 182–192.
Syamsuri, S. & Marethi, I. (2018). APOS analysis on the cognitive process in mathematical proving activities. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 1-12.
Tall, D. (1999). Reflections on APOS theory in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking the psychology of mathematics education. Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for (pp. 111 - 118). Haifa Israel: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Winata, R., & Friantini, R. N. (2020). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa ditinjau dari minat belajar dan gender. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v6i1.7385
Windasari, I. Y., Prasetyowati, D. & Shodiqin, A. (2020). Analisis pemahaman konsep berdasarkan teori apos pada materi barisan geometri di kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Godong. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 417-427.
