Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Setelah Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan MEAs pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Tiga Variabel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v4i1.881Keywords:
Analysis, Problem Solving, Model Eliciting Activities (MEAS), SPLTVAbstract
Abstract
This research is a qualitative descriptive research that aims to investigate the mathematical problem solving after learning with MEAs on linier equation system of three variables. The subject of this research are 5 students of X class of MIA 6 SMA Negeri 10 Palembang. The data of this study was collected by three item of problem solving test on SPLTV and an interview to obtain the data deeply. The result of this study show that the indicator of problem solving that the most often appear is indicator of understanding the probelm,where this indicator appears at each level of ability of students, namely high, medium, and low. While indicator that are very rare to appear are indicator looking back. Where this indicator only appears at the level of the ability of students is high, while for the the level of ability of students who are moderate and low this indicator does not appear. The cause of this indicator rarely arises because most students ignore the command to look back, students feel enough to get the final results without re-analyzing the results that have been obtained.
Keywords: Analysis, Model Eliciting Activities, Problem Solving
Downloads
References
Bintang Zaura, & Sulastri. (2012). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD sebagai upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi barisan dan deret bilangan di kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Labuhanhaji Aceh Selatan. Jurnal Peluang, 1(1), 21–29.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-393
Edo, S. I., Ilma, R., & Hartono, Y. (2013). Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA-model level 5 And 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.561.41-58
Kemendikbud. (2017). Matematika Kelas X SMA/MA/SMK Revisi 2017. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Mujulifah, F. (2015). Literasi matematis siswa dalam menyederhanakan ekspresi aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 12.
NCTM (Ed.). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Vol. 1). Diambil dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Ruseffendi. (2006). Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pengajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suningsih, A. (2015). Pembelajaran garis lurus dengan model eliciting activities dan team assisted individualization ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Jurnal e-DuMath, 1(1), 34–42.
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897
Wardhani, S., & Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP : belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Jakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdaya Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan (PPPPTK).
Yu, S.-Y., & Chang, C.-K. (2009). What did taiwan mathematics teachers think of model-eliciting activities and modeling? ICTMA, 14, 9.
