Implementasi Restrukturisasi Dalam Prosesi Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v7i2.1739Kata Kunci:
Bankruptcy, Suspension of Payment, RestructuringAbstrak
In order to enforce the law in the field of bankruptcy, there are procedures that must be carried out by every justice seeker, namely bankruptcy procedures and suspension of payment. The procedure for bankruptcy and the suspension of payment begins with the application, then followed by the decision of the bankruptcy statement or the suspension of payment and all legal appeals. Inside this process will be found restructuring between debtors to avoid bankruptcy, both in the form of debt restructuring and corporate restructuring. The purpose of this study is to have a description of the implementation on restructuring regarding bankruptcy and suspension of payment procedures, and also to be a guide for optimizing the restructuring plan arranged by the debtor. This research has reached the result that the restructuring in the process of bankruptcy and suspension of payments is mostly the debt restructuring and begins with a settlement plan. Rescheduling is the most popular bankruptcy restructuring model and suspension of payment. In addition it is a combination of rescheduling and asset sales, finding new equity, as well as debt to equity swap. Obsession arises in the process when the debtor arranges a restructuring plan. Some cases show that the debtor's understanding of the use of the restructuring plan is the main reason for the constraint. In addition, the implementation of the restructuring may fail in some cases, citing the lack of ability of the debtor to handle business and debt.
Referensi
Clark, Kent, and Eli Ofek. “Mergers as a Mean of Restructuring Distressed Firms: An Emperical Investigation.†Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (1994).
Fajri, Em Zui, and Ratu Aprilia Senja. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Difa Publisher, n.d.
Gunadi. Restrukturisasi Perusahaan Dalam Berbagai Bentuk Dan Pemajakannya. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2001.
Kairupan, David. “Kepemilikan Dan Pengendalian Perusahaan Terbuka Oleh Pihak Asing: Suatu Analisa Yuridis Dan Komparatif.†Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal Himpunan Konsultan Hukum Pasar Modal (HKHPM) Vol. V Ed. (2014): 41.
Kornelis, Yudi, and Florianus Yudhi Priyo Amboro. Reorganisasi Dalam United States Bankruptcy Code Terhadap Ketentuan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ( PKPU ) Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia Dengan Perspektif Budaya Hukum Indonesia. Batam, 2014.
Kukuh Komandoko Hadiwidjojo. “Metode Dan Konsep Restrukturisasi Sebagai Pelaksanaan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Terhadap Perusahaan Publik Dan Non Publik.†Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal Himpunan Konsultan Hukum Pasar Modal (HKHPM) Vol.VII Ed (2016): 72.
M.P., Manahan Sitompul. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang Perusahaan Dengan Perdamaian Di Dalam Atau Di Luar Proses Kepailitan (Studi Mengenai Lembaga Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang).†Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2009.
Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum. Analisis Dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Restrukturisasi Utang Pada Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2000.
Simanjuntak, Ricardo. “Aspek Hukum Kepailitan Perusahaan Publik Di Pasar Modal.†Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal Vol. V Ed (2013): 57–58.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Faillissementsverordening Juncto Undang-Undang No.4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2002.
â€â€Ââ€â€Ââ€â€Â. Sejarah , Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, 1986.
Weston, J. Fred, Mark L. Mitchell, and J. Harold Mulherin. Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance. Fourth Edi. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education Inc., 2004.
Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
