Analisis Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Pengambilalihan Saham Ditinjau dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 17/KPPU-M/2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v10i1.4948Keywords:
Delays, Takeovers, Shares, KPPU, Business CompetitionAbstract
Based on article 29 of Law Nomor 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, it is explained that the acquisition of shares that have an asset value and or sales value exceeding a certain amount as regulated in Article 5 of Government Regulation Nomor 57 of 2010 is required to carry out a notification to KPPU no later than 30 working days after it is legally effective. However, it was found that through the KPPU decision Nomor17/KPPU-M/2020, it was stated that PT Saratoga Investama Sedaya has been proven to have violated Article 29 of Law Nomor 5 of 1999 in conjunction with Article 5 PP Nomor 57 of 2010. This study aims to find out how to prove the elements of a violation of late notification of share takeover by PT Saratoga Investama Sedaya. This research method is a normative juridical method. The results of this research are that the Commission Council stated that the takeover of shares by the Reported Party did not have the potential to cause monopolistic practices and/or unfair business competition. Because there is no change in market power and there is no vertical integration. However, the Reported party had to bear a fine of Rp. 1 billion because it was stated that he had violated Article 29 of Law Nomor 5 of 1999 in conjunction with Article 5 of PP Nomor 57 of 2010.
References
Arifin, Muchamad. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Atas Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Akuisisi Asing Kepada Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.†Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2, Nomor 2 (2017): 259–77. doi:10.20885/jlr.vol2.iss2.art9.
Asikin, Zainal. Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan. Edited by Prenada Media Group. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Asshiddiqie, Jimmly. Perkembangan Dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Konpress. Jakarta, 2006.
Davies, Stephen; Matthew, Olczak. “Assesing the Efficacy of Structural Merger Remedies: Choosing Between Theories of Harm?†Review of Industrial Organization 37, Nomor 2 (2010).
Ervinna Sapitri, Baiq. “Kewenangan KPPU Dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha (Studi Perbandingan Di Indonesia Dengan Negara-Negara Common Law System).†Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, Nomor 1 (2015): 139–58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12345/ius.v3i7.204.
Fadhilah, Meita. “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial.†Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, Nomor 1 (2019): 55. doi:10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217.
Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. Edited by Sinar Grafika. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan MetodologiPenelitian Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing. Edited by Bayumedia Publishing. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
“Lampiran Peraturan KPPU Nomor 2 Tahun 2013,†30, 2019.
Moin, Abdul. Merger, Akuisisi Dan Divestasi, CV Adipura. Edited by CV Adipura. Yogyakarta: CV Adipura, 2003.
â€â€Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã¢â‚¬â€. Merger, Akuisisi Dan Divestasi. Edited by Ekonosia. Yogyakarta: Ekonosia, 2004.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Edited by PT Citra Aditya. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya, 2010.
Nugroho, S.A. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Teori & Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Edited by Prenada Media Group. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2012.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktek Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Edited by Kencana Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2018.
Prananingtyas, P., Disemadi, H. S., & Sari, R. K. “Legal Regulation and Protections for the Parties in the Franchise Business Agreements in Indonesia.†Hang Tuah Law Journal 3, Nomor 2 (2020).
Preeti, Kartika, Putri; Prananingtyas, Paramita; Mahmudah, Siti. “Analisa Pengawasan KPPU Atas Tindakan Merger Yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Indnonesia.†Diponegoro Law Journal 8, Nomor 2 (2019): 1384–97. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/%0Ahttps://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/%0Ahttps://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Edited by Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Ridwan. Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Edited by Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Press. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Press, 2009.
Shiau, D., and E. Chen. “ASEAN Developments in Merger Control.†Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 5, Nomor 3 (March 1, 2014): 149–57. doi:10.1093/jeclap/lpt074.
Soekanto, Soerjono; Sri, Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edited by PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009.
SugiyoNomor Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Edited by Alfabeta. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009.
Suteki; Galang, Taufani. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, Dan Praktek). Edited by Rajawali Press. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018.
T. Kuntara, S. Januari. “Fungsi Dan Peran Lembaga Kppu Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha Di Kota Medan.†Jurnal Mercatoria 6, Nomor 1 (2013): 58–66. http://www.tjyybjb.ac.cn/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9987.
Wasitaatmadja; Fokky, Fuad. Filsafat Hukum Akar Religiositas Hukum. Edited by Prenada Media Group. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2015.
Zulheri, Zulheri. “Competition Merger Review for Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions in Indonesia.†Indonesia Law Review 7, Nomor 3 (2017). doi:10.15742/ilrev.v7n3.374.
