MENGIDENTIFIKASI PANDANGAN NATURE OF SCIENCE (VNOS) CALON GURU KIMIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v7i2.1550Keywords:
VNOS, Nature of science, calon guru kimiaAbstract
Sangat penting untuk mengetahui pandangan calon guru kimia tentang Nature of Science karena akan mempengaruhi kinerja disaat menjadi guru yang sesungguhnya. Guru yang memiliki pandangan mengenai nature of science (VNOS) yang benar, akan mentransfer kemampuan tersebut kepada para siswanya, begitu juga sebaliknya pemahaman yang salah juga akan tertularkan kepada para siswa. Aspek VNOS yang akan dibahas meliputi (1) Tentativeness, (2) Empirical basis, (3)Subjectivity, (4) Creativity, (5) Social/cultural embeddedness, dan (6) Theories and laws. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuisioner VNOS form B yang telah diadopsi dari Lederman dan pedoman wawancara. Pandangan calon guru kimia dijelaskan dan dikategorikan sebagai naïve, eclectic, dan informed untuk setiap aspek NOS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa calon guru kimia memiliki pandangan yang cukup memadai tentang Nature of Science.
References
Abd-el-khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2009). The Influence of Metacognitive Training on Preservice Elementary Teachers ’ Conceptions of Nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802563324
Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1997). The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice : Making the Unnatural Natural. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Adiputra, I. G. E. D., Mudzakir, A., & Widhiyanti, T. (2019). How do the pre-service chemistry teachers view about the nature of science and technology ? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042043
Ağlarcı, O., Sarıçayır, H., & Şahin, M. (2016). Nature of science instruction to Turkish prospective chemistry teachers : The effect of explicit-reflective approach. Cogent Education, 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1213350
Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2009). Teaching Nature of Science to K †2 Students : What understandings can they attain ? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902717283
Akerson, V. L., Abd-el-khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers ’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 37(4), 295–317.
Asikin, N., & Yulita, I. (2019). Scientific Literacy-Based Chemical Teaching Materials Design of Chemical Solution Materials on Sea Pollution Context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.249
Holbrook, J. (2005). MAKING CHEMISTRY TEACHING RELEVANT. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1–12.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire : Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners ’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
Lokollo, L., Hernani, H., & Mudzakir, A. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teacher ’ s view about the nature of science and technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042036
McComas, W. F. (2002). The nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nentwig, P. M., & Demuth, R. (2007). Chemie im Kontext : Situating Learning in Relevant Contexts while Systematically Developing Basic Chemical Concepts, 84(9), 1439–1444.
Prachagool, V., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). INVESTIGATING THE NATURE OF SCIENCE : AN EMPIRICAL REPORT ON THE TEACHER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN THAILAND. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.17275
Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What Scientists Say : Scientists ’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 727–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.
Wilujeng, I., Kun, Z. P., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). Science learning based on local potential : Overview of the nature of science ( NoS ) achieved. In AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 080005 (pp. 1–7). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995189
Yulita, I. (2018). Analisis Prekonsepsi Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Menghubungkan Konteks Air Laut Dengan Konten Hakikat Ilmu Kimia Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 64–72.
Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1997). The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice : Making the Unnatural Natural. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Adiputra, I. G. E. D., Mudzakir, A., & Widhiyanti, T. (2019). How do the pre-service chemistry teachers view about the nature of science and technology ? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042043
Ağlarcı, O., Sarıçayır, H., & Şahin, M. (2016). Nature of science instruction to Turkish prospective chemistry teachers : The effect of explicit-reflective approach. Cogent Education, 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1213350
Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2009). Teaching Nature of Science to K †2 Students : What understandings can they attain ? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902717283
Akerson, V. L., Abd-el-khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers ’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 37(4), 295–317.
Asikin, N., & Yulita, I. (2019). Scientific Literacy-Based Chemical Teaching Materials Design of Chemical Solution Materials on Sea Pollution Context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.249
Holbrook, J. (2005). MAKING CHEMISTRY TEACHING RELEVANT. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1–12.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire : Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners ’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
Lokollo, L., Hernani, H., & Mudzakir, A. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teacher ’ s view about the nature of science and technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042036
McComas, W. F. (2002). The nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nentwig, P. M., & Demuth, R. (2007). Chemie im Kontext : Situating Learning in Relevant Contexts while Systematically Developing Basic Chemical Concepts, 84(9), 1439–1444.
Prachagool, V., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). INVESTIGATING THE NATURE OF SCIENCE : AN EMPIRICAL REPORT ON THE TEACHER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN THAILAND. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.17275
Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What Scientists Say : Scientists ’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 727–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.
Wilujeng, I., Kun, Z. P., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). Science learning based on local potential : Overview of the nature of science ( NoS ) achieved. In AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 080005 (pp. 1–7). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995189
Yulita, I. (2018). Analisis Prekonsepsi Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Menghubungkan Konteks Air Laut Dengan Konten Hakikat Ilmu Kimia Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 64–72.
1.png)
