Stakeholder Analysis of Indonesia's Trade the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Actor Non-ASEAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/jmps.v1i2.7289Keywords:
Stakeholder Analysis, RCEP, Actor, Non ASEANAbstract
This study examines Indonesia’s trade relations with non-ASEAN member countries under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The RCEP, signed in 2020, presents Indonesia with significant opportunities to expand market access, particularly with key partners like China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. However, challenges persist, particularly in terms of trade imbalances and competitive pressures. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data from trade flow statistics and tariff reductions with qualitative insights from interviews and focus group discussions with key stakeholders. The Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method was applied to assess the effectiveness of RCEP provisions. Results show that while Indonesia benefits from improved market access, significant trade deficits remain, especially with China and Australia. Stakeholders, including government agencies and private sector exporters, play pivotal roles in mitigating these challenges by addressing non-tariff barriers and enhancing trade facilitation. In conclusion, Indonesia must strategically leverage the RCEP framework to address trade imbalances and improve export competitiveness. Policy recommendations include enhancing stakeholder collaboration, improving infrastructure, and increasing awareness among small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to fully utilize RCEP benefits. These efforts will ensure Indonesia remains competitive in global trade.
References
Adila, S., Suryadipura, D., & Suryadipura, D. (2023). ASEAN’s Role In The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Formation to Enhance Regional Economic Integration. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 25(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v25i1.1279
Agwu, E. M. (2019). Impact of Stakeholders’ Analysis on Organizational Performance: A Study of Nigerian Financial Organizations. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDS.2019100104
Bobowski, S. (2017). ASEAN and Trade Regionalism: An Opportunity for Convergence or Threat of “Two Speeds”? Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 5, 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_3
Campbell, H. G. (2023). Maturation of the Bandung Project with Lessons from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The African Review, 50(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/1821889X-20235001
Chakraborty, D., & Chaisse, J. (2021). The Mystery of Reciprocal Demand for Regional Trade Partnership: Indian Experience in RCEP Regional Value Chains. Law and Development Review, 14(1), 163–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/LDR-2020-0078/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth). Sage Publications.
Dosch, J., & Kliem, F. (2023). Regional economic integration: the ASEAN Economic Community and beyond. In The Elgar Companion to ASEAN (pp. 1–282). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800378889
Estrades, C., Maliszewska, M., Osorio-Rodarte, I., & Seara e Pereira, M. (2023). Estimating the economic impacts of the regional comprehensive economic partnership. Asia and the Global Economy, 3(2), 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGLOBE.2023.100060
Gao, H. S. (2022). The Investment Chapter in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Enhanced Rules without Enforcement Mechanism. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4218919
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publication. https://miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1994_Guba_Lincoln_Paradigms_Quali_Research_chapter.pdf
Lando, M. (2022). Enhancing Conflict Resolution ‘ASEAN Way’: The Dispute Settlement System of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 13(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNLIDS/IDAC001
Mahadevan, R., & Nugroho, A. (2019). Can the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership minimise the harm from the United States–China trade war? The World Economy, 42(11), 3148–3167. https://doi.org/10.1111/TWEC.12851
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications.
Pitakdumrongkit, K. (2023). Managing economic statecraft via multilateral agreements: the roles of ASEAN member states in shaping Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. The Pacific Review, 36(5), 1120–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2023.2200022
Raghavan, M., Khan, F., Selvarajan, S. K., & Devadason, E. S. (2023). Cross-country linkages between ASEAN and non-ASEAN-RCEP member states: A global VAR analysis. The World Economy, 46(6), 1782–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/TWEC.13347
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1547-5069.2001.00253.X
Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/15.3.338
Wardani, R. Y. (2022). The interests of China, India, and Japan in the negotiations of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Theoretical perspectives. International Social Science Journal, 72(246), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISSJ.12272
Wardani, R. Y., & Cooray, N. S. (2019). The Savings Potential of Sino-Indian Free Trade Agreement within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Initiatives. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 739–754. http://www.lifescienceglobalca.com/index.php/jrge/article/view/6139
Wu, C. H. (2020). ASEAN at the Crossroads: Trap and Track between CPTPP and RCEP. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/JIEL/JGZ032
Zreik, M. (2024). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) for the Asia–Pacific region and world. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2022-0035/FULL/XML
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ady Muzwardi, Mahadiansar Mahadiansar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Maritim Policy Science This work is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.