Penerapan Argumentasi dan Bahan Ajar dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Biologi Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/ph.v7i2.6994Keywords:
Argumentasi, Pemahaman, Bahan Ajar, Materi BiologiAbstract
Scientific argumentation aimed at reaching a rational perspective on science, scientific concepts, or elements within a scientific procedure. This study is experimental research employing a pretest-posttest control group design. The research was conducted with a population of 44 fifth-semester students majoring in biology education. The sample selection was performed using random sampling, consisting of two classes (experimental and control), each comprising 22 students. Data for the research were collected through pretests and posttests, which included 10 questions with five argumentation indicators via the minimum structure essay test. The research findings demonstrated an enhancement in students' ability to articulate their comprehension of the material when utilizing teaching materials compared to those who did not. As a result, it is recommended that the incorporation of teaching materials into the learning process be implemented in various other courses to foster the development of argumentation skills, including the presentation of claims, data, warrants, backing, and effective rebuttals in the learning process.
References
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation: influence of content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 309–331.
Diniya, D., Ilhami, A., Mahartika, I., & Prakash, O. (2021). Kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah calon guru IPA melalui pendekatan mikir selama pandemi COVID-19. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(1), 141–148.
Engelmann, K., Neuhaus, B. J., & Fischer, F. (2016). Fostering scientific reasoning in education–meta-analytic evidence from intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 333–349.
Erduran, S. (2018). Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1091–1099.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933.
Fania, N., Setiawan, M. E., & Putra, E. (2021). Implementation of Reading, Questioning and Answering (RQA) Learning Strategies in Improving Learning Outcomes of Class XI Students of SMA 6 Kerinci. Journal of Biological Science and Education, 3(2), 90–96.
Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgreen, J. A., Hare, J. C., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a Test of Scientific Argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(4), n4.
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, M. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32–37.
Gunawan, G., Purwoko, A. A., Ramdani, A., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Pembelajaran menggunakan learning management systemberbasis moodle pada masa pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(1), 226–235.
Haruna, A., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Menjelajahi hubungan level argumentasi dengan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal ikatan kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686–2694.
Hyun, H. (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mcgraw-hill Education-Europe.
Inch, E. S. (2002). Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument, 6/e. Pearson Education India.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Karlina, G., & Alberida, H. (2021). Kemampuan argumentasi pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 1–7.
Kloser, M. J., Brownell, S. E., Chiariello, N. R., & Fukami, T. (2011). Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education. PLoS Biology, 9(11), e1001174.
Kundariati, M., Maghfiroh, L., Indriwati, S. E., Rohman, F., & Priambodo, B. (2022). Revealing the effect of local-based teaching materials toward scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving in biology classroom. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 287–295.
Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry (ADI) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa pada konsep pencemaran lingkungan di kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(02), 39–45.
Maulana, M., Zamnah, L. N., & Amam, A. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis aplikasi geogebra pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar berdasarkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa. J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(2), 1–8.
Mok, H. N. (2014). Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 7.
Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638.
Pratiwi, W., & Alimuddin, J. (2019). Analisis kebutuhan bahan ajar bermuatan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi di Sekolah Dasar. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ke-SD-An, 6(1).
Purwati, R., Suranto, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Analysis of argumentation skills in biology learning at Surakarta Senior High School. ICEL 2019: First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019, 438.
Putri, M. D., & Rusdiana, D. (2017). IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 566–572.
Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53.
Robertshaw, B., & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing arguments: Investigating pre-service science teachers’ argumentation skills in a socio-scientific context. Science Education International, 24(2), 195–211.
Rofiuddin, A., Susanto, G., Widyartono, D., Sultan, S., Muzaki, H., & Panich, P. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar BIPA daring tingkat pemula rendah. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 10(1), 153–169.
Setiawan, M. E., & Anggraeni, I. O. (2019). Giving Questions and Getting Answers (GQGA) Strategy Improves Biology Learning Outcomes. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 154–165.
Setiawati, I., & Nurlaelah, I. (2017). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Berargumentasi Guru Dan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Model Toulminâ€TM S Argumen Pattern (Tap) Dan Upaya Perbaikannya. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(01).
Sugiyono, P. D. (2018). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Bandung:(ALFABETA, Ed.).
Sulastri, Y., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2009). Pengaruh penggunaan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dalam pembelajaran biologi di SMPN 2 Cimalaka. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 13(1), 15–22.
Wahdan, W. Z., Sulistina, O., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah materi ikatan kimia peserta didik SMA, MAN, dan perguruan tinggi tingkat I. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia OJS, 2(2).
Widiyono, A., Irfana, S., & Firdausia, K. (2021). Implementasi merdeka belajar melalui kampus mengajar perintis di sekolah dasar. Metodik Didaktik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-Sd-An, 16(2).
