Perbedaan Kematangan Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru IPA Berdasarkan Gender dan Masa Mengabdi

  • Nurul Asikin Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UMRAH
  • Nevrita Nevrita
  • Bony Irawan
Keywords: TPACK, gender variance, tenure experience, science teacher

Abstract

TPACK maturity is an important quality of a modern professional teacher, especially in the current state of the pandemic which requires certain level of technological mastery from teachers. There remain questions as to what variables contributed to TPACK maturity of teachers. The research objective was to examine TPACK maturity among teachers along different tenure lengths and gender. The research was conducted in Tanjungpinang City with a sample of 32 science junior high school teachers consisting of 26 female teachers and 6 male teachers. Data was collected through a questionnaire, assessing 7 aspects of teacher’s TPACK. The results show that teachers with less than 12 years tenure length scored higher in TPACK maturity than teachers with 12 to 24 years tenure length, while teachers with more than 24 years tenure length score the lowest. We suggest this result is moderated by the age group variables from the samples. Based on genders, there is no significant difference in TPACK maturity between male teachers and female teachers. The conclusion is that there are differences in the teacher’s TPACK maturity based on tenure lengths, but there is no significant difference based on gender.

References

Borkoh, Whitcomb J, Liston D. 2009. Wicked problems and other thoughts on. Journal of Teacher Education. 60(1): 3-7
2. Goktas Y. Yildrim S, Yildrim Z. 2009. Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 12 (January): 193-204
3. Suryawati E, Firdaus L, Hernandez Y. 2014. Analisis keterampilan technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) guru biologi SMA negeri kota Pekanbaru. Journal Biogenesis. 11 (1): 67-72
4. Smith EE, Kahlke R, Judd T. 2020. Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 36 (3): 1-14
5. Uslu O. “Factors associated with technology integration to improve instructional abilities: a path model factors associated with technology integration to improve instructional”. Australian Journal of Teacher Education
6. Saubern R, Henderson M, Heinrich E, Redmond P. 2020. Editorial TPACK – time to reboot ?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 36 (3): 1-9
7. Angeli C, Valanides N, Christodoulou A. 2016 Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. Herring, MJ Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. 2nd Editio: 21-42
8. Agustini K., Santyasa IW, Ratminingsih N M. 2019. Analysis of competence on "TPACK": 21st- century teacher professional development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1387 (1): 1-9
9. Koehler MJ, Mishra, P. 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge ?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 9 (1): 60- 70.
10. Nevrita N, Asikin N, Amelia T. 2020. Analisis kompetensi tpack guru melalui media pembelajaran biologi SMA. Indonesian Journal of Science Education. 8 (2): 203-217
11. Nevrita. 2018. The use of learning media by junior high school teachers of science in Tanjungpinang and Bintan. 2 (1): 1-8
12. Hermawan I. 2019. Metodologi penelitian pendidikan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan mixed metode. Jakarta: Hidayatul Quran Kuningan
13. Riduan & Sunarto. 2011. Pengantar Statistik Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta
14. Sahari. 2015. Pengaruh Pendidikan, Pelatihan, dan Pengalaman Mengajar terhadap Profesionalisme Guru Di SMAN I Likupang. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Iqra. 9 (1): 62-86
15. Yurizki D, Murniati M, Syahrun N. 2018. Kompetensi pedagogik dan profesional guru dalam peningkatkan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik SMAN di wilayah barat Kabupaten Bireuen. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia. 6 (2): 68-74
16. Lestari E. 2016. The Relationship between Educational Background and Length of Teaching History Teachers with History Learning Outcomes in High School Students. Edumatica. 2 (1): 288-257.
17. Syukur IA, 2014. Teacher professionalism In implementing information and communication technology in nganjuk district. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.20 (2): 200-210
18. Suyamto J, Masykuri M, Sarwanto S. 2020. Analisis kemampuan TPACK (Technolgical,
Pedagogical, and Content, Knowledge) guru biologi SMA dalam menyusun perangkat pembelajaran materi sistem peredaran darah. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA. 9 (1): 46-57
19. Altun T. 2013. Examination of classroom teachers' technological pedagogical and content knowledge based on their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education. 15 (2), 365-397
20. Karaca F. 2015. An investigation of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge based on a variety of characteristics. International Journal of Higher Education. 4 (4): 130-136
21. Ozudogru M, Ozudogru F. 2019. Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology. 10 (1): 1-24
22. Sukarti S. 2013. Isu gender dan sertifikasi guru versus prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan. 14 (1): 38-43
23. Andrade AB, Gonzales MC, Martin SC. 2020. Digital competencies relationship between gender and generation of university professors. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 10 (1): 205-211
24. Nainggolan R. 2016. Pengaruh pengalaman mengajar terhadap kompetensi guru (lembaga pendidikan non profit). The Progressive and Fun Education Seminar. ISBN: 978-602-361-045-7. Pp. 7-13
25. Paidi, Subali B, Pradana SP, Antony MK. 2020. Biology teacher’s TPACK profile in central Java: description of TPACK mastery based on teaching experience. International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019). 401 (ICERI 2019): 28-32
26. Sezer B. 2015. Examining techno pedagogical knowledge competencies of teachers in terms of some variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174: 208-215
Published
2021-12-08