Keterampilan Productive Pedagogies Calon Guru Biologi Pada Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran di Era Pandemi

  • Iffa Ichwani Putri Universitas Islam Riau
  • Nurul Fauziah
Keywords: Productive Pedagogies, student teacher, intellectual quality

Abstract

This study aims to determine the productive pedagogies skills of prospective teachers in implementing learning in the pandemic era. These skills indicate the professional level of a teacher in carrying out their duties. Ideally the teacher should be able to show every dimension of productive pedagogies during the learning process. Productive pedagogies of a teacher can be seen from three dimensions, namely intellectual quality, relevance, and mastery of the classroom environment. The implementation of this descriptive research is carried out in the implementation of teaching by biology education teacher candidate students who do Field Experience Practices. Productive pedagogies are measured using a Likert scale questionnaire and observation sheets on the implementation of learning. The data obtained were analyzed on the conversion of values ​​with the low to high category, and then the comparison was carried out using the scheme to provide a description of the productive pedagogies' domination. The research findings show that the productive pedagogies of biology teacher candidates based on a questionnaire (85.75) and the implementation of learning (93.00) are in the very good category. The rating of each dimension of productive pedagogies is in the very good category. It can be concluded that prospective biology teachers are considered ready to face learning situations both offline and online with good learning strategies.

References

Al-Ajmi., Soeharto, T. (2014). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Siswa Tentang Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dan Dukungan Sosial Orangtua Dengan Motivasi Belajar Pada Siswa Di MTS Ibadurrahman Tibu Sisok Desa Loang Maka Lombok Tengah Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Sosio-Humaniora 5 (2): 178 – 198.

Atweh B. (2014). Improving Teaching Through Productive Pedagogy. A Paper Presented at the Department of Mathematics Education in the College of Education Research and Innovation Week. University of South Africa.

Atweh, B. (2007). The social turn in understanding learning and its implications for facilitating learning: ripples for change. A journey of preservice teacher education reforms in the Philippines Commission for Higher Education. Quezon City: Print house.

Christine, M. (2009). Pedagogi: Strategi dan Teknik Mengajar dengan Berkesan. Bandung: Setia Purna Ives.

Fleming, M. L., & Levie,W. H. (1993). Instructional Message Design: Principles From The Behavioral And Cognitive Sciences. (2nd Ed) Educational Technology Publications. New York: Englewood Cliffs.

Lovat., T, J. (2003). The Role of the ‘Teacher’ coming of Age?. Australian Council Deans of Education, Discussion Paper. Australian.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Perforance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised Edition, February 2014), PISA, OECD Publishing.

Priansa, D, J. (2014). Kinerja Dan Profesionalisme Guru. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Putri, I, I., Ferazona, I, I. (2019). Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi Bioconcetta. Penilaian Dimensi Productive Pedagogies Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada Perkuliahan Microteaching. Vol. 5 No. 1 Tahun 2019. ISSN: 2460-8556/E-ISSN:2502-1737. Website:ejournal.stkip-pgri-sumbar.ac.id/index.php/.

Putri, I, I. (2016).Productive Pedagogies Guru dalam Pembelajaran Biologi SMA di Kota Pekanbaru. Conference: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Pendidikan Sains FSM UKSW, Salatiga Jawa tengah Indonesia. 11-16. ISSN:2087-0922.

Sahlan, A., & Prastyo, T, A. (2012). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter. Jogjakarta: Ar-Russ Media.

Sani, R, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sadulloh, U. (2010). Pedagogik (Ilmu Mendidik). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulastri, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2014). Kemampuan Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UNSYIAH Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Most Difficult Level. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika. 1 (2): 2355-4185.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, And Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction. 4, 295–312.

Tanko M. G. & Atweh B. (2012) Using Productive Pedagogy to Improve the Teaching and Learning of Practical Numeracy with Adult Learners. Journal of Education and Practice. 3 (16): 88-95.

Published
2021-12-08