Governance Gaps in the Rempang Eco-City Policy: Between Legal Authority and Social Legitimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/juan.v14i1.8356Keywords:
Rempang Eco-City, Social Legitimacy, Formal Legality, Participatory GovernanceAbstract
This study examines the legality–legitimacy gap in the implementation of the Rempang Eco-City policy in Batam, Indonesia. The project is formally positioned as a strategic development agenda intended to accelerate investment, industrial expansion, tourism growth, and regional economic transformation. However, its implementation has generated significant social resistance among affected communities, particularly due to relocation plans, uncertainty over land tenure, disruption of fishing-based livelihoods, and threats to socio-cultural continuity. This research uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical method supported by library research and document analysis. Secondary data were obtained from statutory regulations, government documents, institutional reports, scholarly publications, public statements, and media sources related to Rempang Eco-City. Data were analyzed through a gap analysis model by comparing two main dimensions: formal legality, represented by legal basis, institutional authority, administrative procedures, and policy instruments; and social legitimacy, represented by public acceptance, participation quality, perceived fairness, and recognition of local rights. The findings show that although the Rempang Eco-City policy has a strong formal legal foundation, its implementation remains socially contested because affected communities perceive the process as top-down, insufficiently participatory, and inadequately responsive to their livelihood and cultural attachments. The study also finds that institutional fragmentation, weak deliberative governance, limited transparency, and relocation uncertainty intensify public distrust. Therefore, the Rempang case demonstrates that legal validity alone cannot guarantee policy acceptance or implementation sustainability. The study concludes that strategic development projects require inclusive governance, meaningful participation, accountable institutional coordination, and substantive relocation justice to transform formal legality into social legitimacy.
Downloads
References
Aboda, C., Mugagga, F., Byakagaba, P., & Nabanoga, G. (2019). Development-induced displacement: A review of risks faced by communities in developing countries. Sociology and Anthropology, 7(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2019.070205
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2025). Theorizing the political dimension of collaborative governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 8(3), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf007
Aprimadya, H. (2025). Rethinking situated agency: An interpretive framework to policy implementation. Policy Studies.
Aritonang, S. D. P., & Ayodya Maheswara, I. B. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis konflik relokasi warga di Pulau Rempang berdasarkan perspektif teori kewenangan hukum. IBLAM Law Review, 3(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i3.228
Asruddin, F. A., & Efendi, D. (2024). National Strategic Project (Rempang EcoCity): Indigenous peoples’ resistance in responding to the grabbing of customary land in Rempang Island. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2145–2159. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.578
Aulia, F., & Hanani, R. (2026). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengembangan kawasan transmigrasi Rempang Eco-City. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 15(2).
Azhar, I. Y., & Oliwidyartiza, N. J. (2025). Analisis konflik masyarakat Rempang terkait Proyek Strategis Nasional dalam pembangunan Rempang Eco City. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 5(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v5i2.4917
Bazen, A., Barg, F. K., & Takeshita, J. (2021). Research techniques made simple: An introduction to qualitative research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2), 241–247.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029
Berenschot, W., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Saraswati, N. (2024). Making claims modestly: The norms and discourse driving land conflicts in rural Indonesia. In G. Facal, E. Lafaye de Micheaux, & A. Norén-Nilsson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political norms in Southeast Asia (pp. 545–565). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9655-1_31
Bhakti, C., Samudra, A. A., & Salam, R. (2026). Resolutive policy model for the settlement of land tenure conflicts in National Strategic Projects: A case study of Rempang Eco City, Indonesia. Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 96–110.
Bice, S. (2014). Social licence to operate and impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.950122
Boutilier, R. G. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.941141
Breakey, H. (2025). Understanding and defining the social license to operate: Social acceptance, local values, overall moral legitimacy, and moral authority. Resources Policy, 101, 105424.
Brummel, L., & de Blok, L. (2024). Do political and social accountability arrangements increase citizens’ legitimacy perceptions? A vignette experiment in the Netherlands. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3365–3389.
Carrick, J., Bell, D., Fitzsimmons, C., Gray, T., & Stewart, G. (2023). Principles and practical criteria for effective participatory environmental planning and decision-making. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(14), 2854–2877. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086857
Christensen, T. (2025). Future challenges of public administration. Public Performance & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2549297
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Dalla, A. Y., & Hutabarat, F. N. (2018). Tumpang tindih kewenangan pengembangan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Batam. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 2(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.2.2.2018.139-148
Devlin, J. F., & Yap, N. T. (2020). Resource conflict and governance in the transition to a more just estuarine and coastal future. Ocean & Coastal Management.
Dhiaulhaq, A., McCarthy, J. F., & Yasmi, Y. (2018). Resolving industrial plantation conflicts in Indonesia: Can mediation deliver? Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.006
Didenko, N. I., Gazizulina, A. R., Kikkas, K. N., & Skripnuk, D. F. (2020). Dynamics of trust in institutions, the legitimacy of the social order, and social open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040111
Eabrasu, M., Brueckner, M., & Spencer, R. (2021). A social licence to operate legitimacy test: Enhancing ethical business practice. In Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability. Emerald Publishing.
Fahlevi, R., Djunaid, I. S., Sinambela, F. A., Djati, S. P., & Rahmanita, M. (2024). Dampak sosial dan ekonomi pariwisata dari konflik Rempang. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 3312–3316.
Fatem, S. M., Awang, S. A., Pudyatmoko, S., Sahide, M. A. K., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2018). Camouflaging economic development agendas with forest conservation narratives: A strategy of lower governments for gaining authority in re-centralising Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 78, 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.018
Figueroa, O. P., & Grant, A. (2024). Barriers and opportunities to incorporating environmental justice into environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 109, 107663.
Garti, I., Gray, M., Bromley, A., & Tan, J. Y. B. (2022). A qualitative document analysis of policies influencing preeclampsia management by midwives in Ghana. Women and Birth, 35(6), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.01.006
Ghuffran, M., Nugraha, D. A., Nilan, N., & Rezki, S. (2024). Analisis kasus Pulau Rempang di Batam ditinjau dari conflict theory. Jurnal Iuris Studia, 5, 392–403.
Herman, H., et al. (2025). Strategic development policy, public legitimacy, and community acceptance in investment-oriented governance. Journal of Governance and Public Policy.
Izadi, M., et al. (2023). Document-based qualitative inquiry and policy interpretation in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
Kayesa, N. K., & Shung-King, M. (2021). The role of document analysis in health policy analysis studies in low- and middle-income countries: Lessons for HPA researchers from a qualitative systematic review. Health Policy OPEN, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100024
Kiwi, D., Khanagha, S., & Alexiou, A. (2025). Understanding the role of legitimacy during strategic change in public organizations: A review and research agenda. Public Performance & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2476572
Kurniawan, W. (2025). Community-based governance and public trust in the implementation of Rempang Eco-City policy. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan Publik.
Manullang, E. B., Rusdiana, S., & Situmeang, A. (2026). Kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia terhadap relokasi masyarakat Kampung Tua Pulau Rempang dalam pembangunan Rempang Eco City. Jurnal USM Law Review, 9(1).
Marufah, U. (2025). Digital activism of Rempang community and solidarity against Rempang Eco-City project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social and Political Sciences. Atlantis Press.
Meesters, M. E., & Behagel, J. H. (2021). The social licence to operate: Ambiguities and the neutralization of harm in resource governance. Resources Policy.
Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, 39, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003
Murti, M. A., & Susilowati, I. F. (2024). Legal protection for the customary community of Kampung Tua Pulau Rempang against the impact of the Rempang Eco-City project in Batam City. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 11(4), 578–600.
Papadopoulos, Y. (2025). From public to transnational administration. Public Performance & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2491402
Perlaviciute, G. (2025). Understanding the relationship between public participation and public acceptability of climate policies. Cell Reports Sustainability, 2, 100137.
Puspita, D., Zahra, H. Z., Faeyza, D., & Asadurrohman, M. (2024). Socio-cultural identity and land attachment in the Rempang Eco-City conflict. Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik.
Queen, R., et al. (2022). Qualitative inquiry, interpretive analysis, and methodological reflexivity in social research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.
Ramadhan, D., Martha, D. S., Fadhilah, N. L., & Atika, W. (2024). Analisa penerapan proyek Rempang Eco City yang mengabaikan hak ulayat dan melukai keadilan masyarakat adat. Perahu: Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.51826/perahu.v12i1.953
Rasyad, P. A., et al. (2024). Diskriminasi dalam pembangunan Eco City terhadap masyarakat Pulau Rempang. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 62–71.
Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., Hamdani, F. A. U., Subarudi, Alviya, I., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007
Sankofa, N. (2023). Critical method of document analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(6), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2113664
Scuttari, A., Windegger, F., Wallnöfer, V., & Pechlaner, H. (2025). Bridging the science-policy gap in sustainable tourism: Evidence from a multiple case study analysis of UNWTO INSTO Sustainable Tourism Observatories. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2279023
Stephen, G. W., & Bahri, S. (2023). Kontestasi kepentingan pro-growth coalition dan anti-growth coalition dalam konflik pembangunan Rempang Eco-City tahun 2023. MADANI: Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(2), 381–403.
Stronge, D. C., Kannemeyer, R. L., & Edwards, P. (2024). Building social licence to operate: A framework for gaining and maintaining meaningful, trustworthy relationships. Resources Policy, 89, 104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104586
Suboticki, I., Heidenreich, S., Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2023). Fostering justice through engagement: A literature review of public engagement in energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 99, 103053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103053
Toku, N. (2025). Strategic development, community consent, and governance legitimacy in investment-based development projects. Land Use Policy.
Tortosa-Edo, V., & López-Navarro, M. Á. (2025). Citizens’ legitimacy judgements on multi-stakeholder governance models: The spillover effects of corporate political activity and social trust. European Management Journal, 43, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.04.004
Vanclay, F. (2017). Project-induced displacement and resettlement: From impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1278671
Verhoest, K. (2024). Trust and distrust in public governance settings. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918
Wafi, A., & Mas’odi, M. (2024). Urgensitas penerapan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik pada konflik Rempang Eco City. Syura: Journal of Law, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.58223/syura.v2i1.177
Wiesner, C. (2022). Doing qualitative and interpretative research: Reflecting principles and principled challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4(1), 2127372. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372
Wodschow, A., Nathan, I., & Cerutti, P. (2016). Participation, public policy-making, and legitimacy in the EU Voluntary Partnership Agreement process: The Cameroon case. Forest Policy and Economics, 63, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.001
Yang, Y. (2025). Public participation, displacement governance, and social legitimacy in development-induced relocation. World Development.
Yohanes, Y., et al. (2025). Government policy on settlement relocation: Community acceptance and governance challenges in the Rempang Eco-City case. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.
Yuli, Y. (2025). National strategic projects, land conflict, and the legitimacy of development policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy.
Zaenuddin, M. (2025). Institutional fragmentation and accountability challenges in Batam governance. Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eva Amalia, Wahjoe Pangestoeti, Roni Adi, Siti Arieta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
