E-Certificate Policy in Equivalency Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Its Impact on the Recognition of Non-Formal Graduates in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/jgbr.v3i1.8117Keywords:
Policy, Equivalency Education, Non-Formal Graduates, DigitalAbstract
Equivalency education plays an important role in Indonesia’s national education system by providing alternative learning pathways for citizens who are unable to complete formal schooling through regular educational routes. However, graduates of non-formal education, particularly those from Paket A, Paket B, and Paket C, still face challenges related to certificate recognition, administrative verification, public trust, and acceptance by higher education institutions, employers, and public agencies. In response to these issues, the e-certificate policy has emerged as a significant instrument for strengthening the credibility, authenticity, and portability of educational credentials in the digital era. This study aims to analyze the opportunities, challenges, and impacts of e-certificate policy on the recognition of non-formal education graduates in Indonesia. The research employed a qualitative approach using secondary data analysis. Data were collected from regulations, government policy documents, institutional reports, scholarly articles, and relevant literature on digital credentials, equivalency education, and educational recognition. The data were analyzed through document review and content analysis by identifying regulatory foundations, institutional mechanisms, implementation challenges, and recognition outcomes. The findings show that e-certificate policy offers several opportunities, including faster certificate issuance, easier digital verification, reduced document falsification, improved administrative efficiency, and stronger institutional trust in non-formal education credentials. Nevertheless, the policy also faces challenges related to unequal digital infrastructure, limited institutional readiness, data protection risks, inconsistent recognition across sectors, and the continuing social stigma toward equivalency education graduates.
Downloads
References
Alsobhi, H. A., & Alakhtar, R. A. (2023). Blockchain-based micro-credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 265, 110238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110238
Arbarini, M., Yusuf, A., & Ilyas. (2022). The role of community learning centers in supporting equivalency education and lifelong learning in Indonesia. Journal of Nonformal Education, 8(1), 1–12.
Aurora European Universities Alliance. (2024). Guidelines for designing, issuing, and recognizing micro-credentials. Aurora European Universities Alliance.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bruguera, C., Pagès, C., Peters, M., & Fitó, À. (2025). Micro-credentials and soft skills in online education: The employers’ perspective. Distance Education, 46(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2435645
Cedefop. (2025). Microcredentials for labour market education and training: Recognition, quality assurance, and policy development. Publications Office of the European Union.
Chakroun, B., & Keevy, J. (2018). Digital credentialing: Implications for the recognition of learning across borders. UNESCO.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Chen, S. W. (2022). Students’ perceptions on the recognition of holistic competency achievement: A systematic mixed studies review. Educational Research Review, 35, 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100431
Chaniago, A. (2021). Digital certificate authentication and verification system using QR code technology. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 7(2), 115–126.
Council of the European Union. (2022). Council recommendation of 16 June 2022 on a European approach to micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability. Official Journal of the European Union, C 243, 10–25.
Dale-Jones, B., & Keevy, J. (2021). Digital credentials: Discussions on fluency, data privacy and the recognition of learning in higher education beyond COVID-19. In J. Keevy, A. Deij, & B. Chakroun (Eds.), Learning for a better future: Perspectives on higher education, cities, business and civil society (pp. 193–209). AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2021.BK214.09
European Commission. (2022). A European approach to micro-credentials. European Commission.
European Commission. (2024). Micro-credentials in higher education and lifelong learning. European Education Area.
European Union. (2022). Council recommendation of 16 June 2022 on a European approach to micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability. Official Journal of the European Union, C 243, 10–25.
Gamage, K. A. A., Dehideniya, D. M. S. C. P. K., & Ekanayake, S. Y. (2025). Unlocking career potential: How micro-credentials are revolutionising higher education and lifelong learning. Education Sciences, 15(5), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050525
Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Data privacy, digital credentials, and trust in technology-enhanced learning environments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1101–1118.
Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D. K. (Eds.). (2016). Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials: Demonstrating and recognizing knowledge and competencies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1
Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2024 tentang ijazah jenjang pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
MICROBOL. (2022). Micro-credentials linked to the Bologna key commitments: Desk research report. MICROBOL Project.
OECD. (2021). Quality and value of micro-credentials in higher education: Preparing for the future. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). Micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability: Uses and possibilities. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2024). Quality matters: Strengthening education systems through quality assurance and recognition. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2025). Empowering the workforce in the context of a skills-first approach. OECD Publishing.
Peters, M., Beirne, E., & Brown, M. (2025). Micro-credentials and their implications for lifelong learning: Global insights and critical perspectives. Distance Education, 46(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2025.2463137
Rustemi, A., Dalipi, F., Atanasovski, V., & Risteski, A. (2023). A systematic literature review on blockchain-based systems for academic certificate verification. IEEE Access, 11, 64679–64696. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3289598
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Singh, M. (2015). Global perspectives on recognising non-formal and informal learning: Why recognition matters. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15278-3
Tariq, A., Binte Haq, H., & Ali, S. T. (2023). Cerberus: A blockchain-based accreditation and degree verification system. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(4), 1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3188453
UNESCO. (2018). Digital credentialing: Implications for the recognition of learning across borders. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Non-state actors in education—Who chooses? Who loses? UNESCO.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2012). UNESCO guidelines for the recognition, validation and accreditation of the outcomes of non-formal and informal learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2015). Global inventory of regional and national qualifications frameworks. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2022). Making lifelong learning a reality: A handbook. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2023). Lifelong learning policies and strategies: Key issues and future directions. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2018). Digital credentials and recognition of learning in technical and vocational education and training. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zurmi Afriani, Fepi Trimunir Haryanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
