Optimizing Marine Governance in the Kepulauan Riau for Ecosystem Sustainability and Economic Welfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/jgbr.v1i1.7132Keywords:
Marine Governance, Ecosystem Sustainability, Economic WelfareAbstract
Kepulauan Riau, an Indonesian province rich in marine resources, faces significant challenges in managing its coastal ecosystems and sustainable economic development. Despite the region's vast marine potential, including fisheries, tourism, and natural gas reserves, issues such as illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, marine pollution, and ecosystem degradation threaten its sustainability. This study aims to explore the optimization of marine governance in Kepulauan Riau, focusing on balancing ecosystem protection with economic welfare for coastal communities. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing a literature review of scientific articles, government reports, NGO publications, and books related to marine governance and sustainable resource management. The findings highlight the need for stronger law enforcement, enhanced community participation, and the development of marine ecotourism and aquaculture as sustainable alternatives. The study also emphasizes the importance of integrating digital technologies for better fisheries management and monitoring. In conclusion, optimizing marine governance in Kepulauan Riau requires a holistic approach that incorporates community involvement, technological innovation, and policy reforms to ensure long-term sustainability and improve economic welfare for local populations. Effective governance will not only safeguard marine ecosystems but also drive inclusive economic growth in the region.
Downloads
References
Agardy, T., di Sciara, G. N., & Christie, P. (2011). Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 35(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2010.10.006
Cantasano, N., & Pellicone, G. (2014). Marine and river environments: A pattern of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) in calabria (southern italy). Ocean and Coastal Management, 89, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.12.007
Charles, A. (2012). People, oceans and scale: Governance, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in marine social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.05.011
Chen, J., Li, P., Wang, X., & Yi, K. (2023). Above management: Scale development and empirical testing for public opinion monitoring of marine pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114953
Clark, A. M. (1998). The qualitative-quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation. J Adv Nurs, 27(6), 1242–1249.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. In Sage Publications. Washington DC, United States of America: Sage publications.
Crowder, L., & Norse, E. (2008). Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.012
Foley, M. M., Halpern, B. S., Micheli, F., Armsby, M. H., Caldwell, M. R., Crain, C. M., Prahler, E., Rohr, N., Sivas, D., Beck, M. W., Carr, M. H., Crowder, L. B., Emmett Duffy, J., Hacker, S. D., McLeod, K. L., Palumbi, S. R., Peterson, C. H., Regan, H. M., Ruckelshaus, M. H., … Steneck, R. S. (2010). Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 34(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.001
Gao, L., Bao, W., & Shi, L. (2022). Governance mechanism and performance of marine eco-economic system: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108668
Germond, B., & Germond-Duret, C. (2016). Ocean governance and maritime security in a placeful environment: The case of the European Union. Marine Policy, 66, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.010
Girlovan, A., Tudor, C., Saiu, G. R., & Guse, D. D. (2025). Exploring the impact of globalization and economic-energy dynamics on environmental sustainability in the EU. Global Transitions, 7, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2024.12.002
Kelly, C., Ellis, G., & Flannery, W. (2018). Conceptualising change in marine governance: Learning from Transition Management. Marine Policy, 95, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2018.06.023
Manullang, A. J. (2024). Unraveling the Maintenance of Southeast Asia’s Maritime Security: A Look into the ASEAN Maritime Outlook. Journal of Maritime Policy Science, 1(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.31629/JMPS.V1I1.6878
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion (United Kingdom), 30(7), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659114559116
Morf, A., Moodie, J., Gee, K., Giacometti, A., Kull, M., Piwowarczyk, J., Schiele, K., Zaucha, J., Kellecioglu, I., Luttmann, A., & Strand, H. (2019). Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea. Ocean and Coastal Management, 177, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.009
Muzwardi, A., & Mahadiansar, M. (2024). Stakeholder Analysis of Indonesia’s Trade the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Actor Non-ASEAN. Journal of Maritime Policy Science, 1(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.31629/JMPS.V1I2.6942
Newell, R. G., Sanchirico, J. N., & Kerr, S. (2005). Fishing quota markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.06.005
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. In Qualitative Inquiry (Vol. 3rd). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.2307/330063
Saad, S., Ahmad, Z., Rani, M. H., Khodzori, M. F. A., Yusof, M. H., Noor, N. M., & Mukai, Y. (2015). Assessing the Potential of Mangrove Educotourism to Marine Protected Area: A Case of Tioman and Tulai Islands, Pahang, Malaysia. Natural Resources, 06(07), 442–449. https://doi.org/10.4236/NR.2015.67042
Schneidewind, U., & Augenstein, K. (2012). Analyzing a transition to a sustainability-oriented science system in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 3, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.04.004
Sharif, A., Godil, D. I., Xu, B., Sinha, A., Rehman Khan, S. A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Revisiting the role of tourism and globalization in environmental degradation in China: Fresh insights from the quantile ARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122906
Smythe, T. C. (2017). Marine spatial planning as a tool for regional ocean governance?: An analysis of the New England ocean planning network. Ocean and Coastal Management, 135, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.10.015
Smythe, T. C., & McCann, J. (2018). Lessons learned in marine governance: Case studies of marine spatial planning practice in the U.S. Marine Policy, 94, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2018.04.019
van Tatenhove, J. P. M. (2017). Transboundary marine spatial planning: a reflexive marine governance experiment? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(6), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1292120
Wang, J., Wang, S., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., & Ru, X. (2021). Examining when and how perceived sustainability-related climate influences pro-environmental behaviors of tourism destination residents in China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hena Salsabila Putri, Fahriana Nur Anita, Nelinia Aulija, Dinda Amalia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.