Tanggung Jawab Pidana Pengurus Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Atas Keterlibatan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Nomor 111/ Pid.B/2015/PN.Skh)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v9i1.3799Keywords:
Cooperatives, Management, Criminal LiabilityAbstract
A cooperative is a legal entity that is structured as a joint effort based on the principles of kinship and economic democracy. One of the cooperative organs is the management, which in the management of the cooperative, the management can appoint managers who are given the authority and power to manage the business. The use of the term Manager is intended to cover a broader understanding and provide an alternative for Cooperatives. Thus, according to its interests, the Cooperative can appoint Managers as managers or directors. This study analyzes criminal liability for letter falsification by the management of the Cooperative. The research method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the act of counterfeiting letters carried out by cooperative management could be subject to criminal liability if it was proven and fulfilled all the elements in Article 264 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, namely the existence of a criminal act (against the law), above a certain age can responsible, has a form of error in the form of intentional or negligence and there is no forgiving reason.
References
Cahyaningrum, Dian. “Bentuk Badan Hukum Koperasi Untuk Menjalankan Kegiatan Usaha Perbankan (Cooperative As A Legal Entity To Conduct Banking Business Activities).†Negara Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017): 4.
Endri, Endri, Suryadi Suryadi, and Pery Rehendra Sucipta. “Proporsionalitas Putusan Hakim Berdasarkan Ide Keseimbangan.†Jurnal Selat 7, no. 2 (October 8, 2020): 199–222. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/selat/article/view/2391.
Hatta Isnaini Wahyu Utomo. “The Position of Honorary Council of Notary in Coaching Indonesian Notaries.†Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 92 (2019).
Isnaini, Hatta, and Wahyu Utomo. “The Existence of the Notary and Notarial Deeds within Private Procedural Law in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0.†International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 10, no. 3 (2019): 128–139.
Manihuruk, Tri Novita Sari. “Problematika Kejaksaan Negeri Pekanbaru Dalam Mengeksekusi Uang Pengganti Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi.†Jurnal Selat 8, no. 2 (May 31, 2021): 268–281. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/selat/article/view/3134.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Purwaningsih, Iin. “Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Melibatkan Notaris.†Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (January 28, 2019): 1. http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/hukeno/article/view/1914.
Suadnyani, Dewa Ayu Made Dwi; Anak Agung Ngurah Wirasila. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Sehat Di Indonesia.†Kertha Semaya 9, no. 4 (2021): 695.
Teguh Tresna Puja Asmara; Tarsisius Murwadji; Bambang Daru Nugroho. “Tanggung Jawab Pemilik Koperasi Pada Saat Terjadi Kredit Macet Ditinjau Dari Teori Kepastian Hukum.†IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2020): 115.
Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu, and Imam Safi’i. “Tanggung Jawab Mantan Karyawan Notaris Sebagai Saksi Akta Terhadap Kerahasian Akta.†Res Judicata 2, no. 1 (July 31, 2019): 213. http://openjurnal.unmuhpnk.ac.id/index.php/RJ/article/view/1444.
Zain, Muhammad Adib. “Politik Hukum Koperasi Di Indonesia (Tinjauan Yuridis Historis Pengaturan Perkoperasian Di Indonesia).†Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 3 (2015): 165.
