How the Buzz Group Technique Affects Students' Speaking Skill

Authors

  • Veranika Dewi Panca Hotmarito Manalu Vera Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • hanifah Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (UMRAH)
  • Elsa Ernawati Nainggolan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (UMRAH)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31629/juliet.v5i1.5968

Keywords:

Buzz Group Technique, Speaking Skill, Hortatory Exposition Text

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to see how the buzz group technique affected students' speaking skills in hortatory exposition. The study's design was quasi-experimental, there are one group experimental and one group control class include pre-test, post-test and treatment. The population of this study was eleventh grade students, with 74 individuals drawn from two classrooms. In this study, the researcher used a speaking test as the instrument of this research. Data analysis found that buzz group technique has affected to the students’ speaking skill. This was discovered by data calculated using the samples T-test procedure. The statistics clearly showed that Sig. 2 tailed was 0.000. The sig. 2 tailed 0.000 > 0.05 indicates that the Buzz Group Technique had an affected students' speaking skills in hortatory exposition material at SMA Negeri 4 Tanjungpinang. The researcher proposes that teachers utilize the buzz group technique to teach speaking since it has a considerable affected on students' speaking skills based on the data.

References

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). “Three generations of distance education pedagogyâ€Â. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890

Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (2014). “Teaching English as a Foreign Languageâ€Â, New York: Rouletdge 180:2.

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2010). “Principles of Language Learning and Teaching Fourth Editionâ€Â. New York: Wesley Longman 426:26.

Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2002). “The Cambridge guide to teaching english to speakers of other languagesâ€Â. ELT Journal, 56(1), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.87

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). “Case studiesâ€Â. In Research Methods in Education (6th ed). New York: Routledge 143:45 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-19

Creswell, J. W. (2012). “Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluting Quantitative and Qualitive Research 4th Editionâ€Â. Boston: Pearson. 167:89

Daulay, S. H. Lubis, Y., Damanik, E. S. D., Wandini, R. R., & Putri, F. A. (2021). “Does Pictionary Game Effective for Students’ Speaking Skill†Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 13–25.

Dirgeyasa, Wy. I. (2015). “What and How to Assess a Genre-Based Writingâ€Â. Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Language Education: English Language Teaching, 9(9), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p45 State University of Makasar South Sulewesi Indonesia.

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). “Motivation Foreign Language Motivating in Classroom the Foreign Language Classroomâ€Â. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284

Elizabeth F. Barkley. Claire Howell Major, and K. Patricia Cross. (2014). “Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty, 2nd edâ€Â. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons 276:93

Gay, L.R, Miles, G. E. and Airasian, P. (2011). “Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. 10th Editionâ€Â. Pearson Education International, Boston 49(2): 243-72

Jailani, A. (2016). Thesis: “The Effect of Using Buzz Group Method on Students’ Motivation and Their Speaking Ability at Senior High School Levelâ€Â. In Journal of Asian Islamic Higher Institutions (JAIHI): journal (Vol. 2, Issue 2). http://www.aiua.asia/

Larsen-Freeman. (2015). “Techniques and Principles in Language Teachingâ€Â. New York: Oxford University Press. 2nd Edition 43(4), 343-375.

Leong, L., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). “An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learners’ English Speaking Skillâ€Â. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34–41.

Luhman. (2016). “The Effectiveness of Animation Video in Teaching Speaking to Junior High Schoolâ€Â. Journal of English Language and Education 2(1):33.

Maulana, D., Wahyuni, W. S., & Siregar, D. (2019). “The Correlation Between 85Motivation Behaviour and Speaking Abilityâ€Â. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(2), 115.https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i2.p115-124

Rivera Munoz, C. A., Baik, C., & Lodge, J. M. (2020). “Teacher and student interactions in the first year of universityâ€Â. Journal of Further and HigherEducation, 44(8), 1130–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1664731

Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2016). “Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedbackâ€Â. Cambridge: journal of education, 36(4), 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601048357.

Ulan, D. A. (2017). “An Analysis of Classroom Interaction in the Teaching-Learning Process of Speaking at Tenth Grade Students of Smk Al-Husain Keling in the Academic Year of 2017/2018â€Â. Jurnal Edulingua, Vol 4(2), 94-100.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): JULIET Volume 5 Number 1

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Language, Literature, and English Teaching (JULIET)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.